This workflow compares the ranking obtained by the ACUTA algorithm with the one obtained with the PROMETHEE method, on the classical “Thierry’s sports car choice” example [BouyssouEtAl2000], based on the example for the URPDM2010 conference in Coimbra, Portugal. It extends this example for the special issue of a journal linked to the conference.
This workflow contains 3 parts:
This example is discussed in further details in [BigaretMeyer2011].
|[BigaretMeyer2011]||Meyer P, Bigaret S, diviz: a tool for modeling, processing and sharing algorithmic workflows in MCDA, (submitted) (preliminary |
|[BousEtAl2010]||Bous G, Fortemps P, Glineur F, Pirlot M, ACUTA: A novel method for eliciting additive value functions on the basis of holistic preference statements, European Journal of Operational Research, submitted, 2010.|
|[BouyssouEtAl2000]||Bouyssou D, Marchant T, Pirlot M, Perny P, Tsoukiàs A, Vincke P. Evaluation and decision models: A critical perspective, Kluwer, 2000.|